Critic’s Rating: 3.0/5
In the film “Ajmer 92,” the audience is taken on a haunting journey back to 1992, where the city of Ajmer was gripped by a shocking and harrowing incident. Inspired by true events, the movie sheds light on the horrifying blackmail and sexual abuse of more than 200 schoolgirls, orchestrated by powerful individuals with political affiliations. While the film remains faithful to the actual occurrences, it tactfully refrains from explicitly mentioning the perpetrators’ connections to the Sufi Dargah, keeping the focus on the story’s essence.
The narrative of “Ajmer 92” centers around the love story of Madhav (played by Karan Verma), a journalist at the local newspaper, and Geeta (portrayed by Sumit Singh), a college student and the daughter of Ranjeet Singh (Rajesh Sharma), the city’s Superintendent of Police. As the film progresses, the plot takes a dark turn when Mohan (Aakash Dahiya), Madhav’s rival and newspaper owner, publishes a blurred-nude photo of a girl, triggering a public outcry. As Madhav and the police dig deeper into the matter, shocking revelations come to the surface, exposing the widespread sexual exploitation and blackmail of over 250 girls, orchestrated by politically connected influential men. The investigation unravels a web of corruption and abuse that has plagued the city for far too long.
The film addresses the crucial cause of women empowerment, delivering a powerful and timely message. Given the current societal context and recent headlines about similar incidents, “Ajmer 92” becomes an unignorable testament to the gravity of rape as a heinous crime capable of devastating victims’ lives. The movie successfully highlights the importance of standing up for women’s rights and seeking justice for those affected by such abhorrent crimes.
While “Ajmer 92” manages to keep the audience engaged and captivated throughout, some aspects could have been further explored to add depth to the screenplay. There are moments when the storytelling feels superficial, leaving viewers yearning for a more profound exploration of the case. Additionally, the film’s impact would have been heightened if the tension and emotion were skillfully conveyed through the actors’ performances rather than relying heavily on a loud background score.
The supporting cast, including talented actors like Rajesh Sharma, Sayaji Shinde, and Manoj Joshi, deliver commendable performances, adding depth to the film’s narrative. However, the lead actors, Karan Verma and Sumit Singh, fall short in leaving a lasting impression. Karan’s portrayal lacks the necessary depth and intensity, particularly evident in a scene where he confronts his father after a brutal beating, where his performance feels lackluster and uninspired.
Despite its flaws, “Ajmer 92” remains an important and impactful film that sheds light on a dark chapter in history. It successfully emphasizes the significance of addressing issues related to sexual exploitation and standing up against powerful perpetrators. The movie serves as a timely reminder of the urgency to support women’s rights and advocate for justice for victims of such heinous crimes.
1 Pingback